I
have seen several discussions on the concept that the union of authority
dynamics being embedded in the compatibility of partners.
I
agree that a relationship, regardless of nature, is indeed founded its compatibility.
Being like-minded, myself
As
individuals, and very much the ideal of nurturing that individuality, wanting
someone that can and does think for himself or herself, yet create a union of
" like minds" in certain aspects.
I
have seen the concepts voiced of " thinking alike" or taking on the
thinking of their "D-type", still not losing their own individuality.
Example:
"My submissive would do as "I", would do", in a situation
for instance.
Now
this is not uncommon in decision making, and commonly exemplified in more
mundane decisions perhaps. However, I believe it can and many times becomes
deeper, more aligned, and more in union. Not only because like morals and ideas
were the the same initially.
I
am one who believes that submission in an authority dynamic is more than merely
about obedience, just as dominance is more than merely about giving commands.
I
also believe that one makes a choice for himself or herself as to what they
will or not do, based on their own moral compass. Regardless, we are not
talking about force, nor coercion here, we are talking about cognizant and
cogent thought.
Granted
that there is a trust and compatibility established that comforts ones security
that they would not be asked to do certain things that would be so against
their morals and ideals. To me that is a "no-brainer". I would not
ask her to do something illegal, nor injure another, etc.
Those
are easily discarded from consideration, and the point being, our moral
compatibility and trust that I would not is aligned.
The
depth and type of compatibility, the ever changing of individuals over time
beliefs, thinking, behaviors, even morals is dynamic, not stagnant.
So
given the idea of personal and individual moral in regard to obedience, I ran
across this saying today.
What
are your thoughts in this regard?
No comments:
Post a Comment