How
many times have we heard it?
Someone
either calling a submissive a brat, or a submissive calling him or herself a
brat.
What
does "bratty sub" really mean and is it necessarily a bad thing?
Brat
can mean a lot of things to a lot of people, and many people who label
themselves as bratty, see it as an endearing or positive quality.
Numerous
Dominants who label a sub bratty tend to view it as a much less endearing
quality.
Why
does one see it as cute and the other as frustrating?
MORE
IMPORTANTLY:
Why
do some subs have a bratty disposition?
Subs,
who think bratty is okay, appear to think of it as a way of showing their
playful personality or asserting their individuality.
Certainly,
many subs tend toward a bit of cheekiness, which is not quite the same as being
bratty, however, not all Dominants agree with this statement, so subs should be
careful in your cheekiness.
Sometimes,
the constraints of service and discipline can tend to flatten a submissive's
personality to some extent, and a bit of cheekiness can be a way of expressing
individuality.
The
line I draw between cheekiness and being bratty, is the line where respect is
lost and cheekiness becomes a form of defiance, and cheekiness is usually
dropped the second a Dominant shows annoyance.
Being
bratty continues beyond this line, however, a little cheekiness in a submissive
can be cute, but being excessively bratty is simply embarrassing and annoying
for the Dominant.
I
have seen that being bratty in most of its forms, from mildly annoying behavior
to confrontational defiance, and In my book, in many of its forms, being a brat
is a way of getting attention.
Now,
this may seem obvious to many or one may argue that defiance is not a way of
getting attention.
Of
course it is. It is a negative way, but it is still a valid way of getting
attention. Yes, I said valid. I did not say it was a good way, however, often,
it works.
That
is why subs utilize it, and that is why it is valid.
Why
are some subs are attention sluts?
I,
occasionally, think some Dominants completely miss the boat on this.
Some
Dominants can get so wrapped up in the warmth from getting all that wonderful
attention from their submissive that they fail to realize that some subs are
there to get the same amount of attention back!
Yes,
I hate to burst the Dominant bubble, but many subs are not in a power-exchange
relationship to give unstintingly and endlessly to someone else with little or
no reward, as they actually want and expect to get back at least a large
portion of the attention they give.
As
a Dominant, think about that great oral sex received, where he or she spent
hours o stroking you, caressing you, teasing you with lips and tongue, while
you just laid back and sank into the wonderful sensations.
At
some point, your submissive is probably expecting some lengthy interaction with
you, where your submissive is the complete focus of your attention, to even
things out.
It
may or may not be sexual, but it will be on par with the attention you have received.
The
power-exchange dynamic is not a one-way street, as subs come into it and stay
in it, because they crave the attention we Dominants can give them, and there
is nothing like it.
It
is addictive. It is seductive like a drug, and when denied too long, the
craving eats at them. They need and/or crave it, and will beg, crawl, and give
oral sex for a month; they will be the biggest brats in the world if necessary,
just anything, to get that attention.
A
funny thing can happen when some Dominants are happy or content, they often
tend to turn their attention elsewhere, away from the person creating that
contentment, and this can be most annoying to their submissive.
For
example, the submissive has just spent the last several hours spit polishing
the dominant's boots only to have him or her say, "They have been watching
that individual over there. I think I will go see if he or she will play with
me."
At
this point, the submissive has several options:
The
submissive can simply say "Yes, Ma’am" and fade into the background
to nurse his or her own needs and hope the dominant will still have time and
attention for her own submissive later.
The
submissive can crawl to the Dominant’s feet and beg for play for his or
herself.
OR
The
submissive can enter "brat" mode and start to misbehave.
Now,
if the Dominant cares at all about bratty behavior, he or she knows she will
have to deal with this immediately, and the sub is suddenly the focus of all
the dominant's attention albeit, negative attention, but it is still attention.
Do
not misunderstand me, as I am not advocating this type of behavior, because at
its best, it is a cute little behavior that the dominant can adore and
encourage in small ways, however, at its worst it can destroy a power-exchange
dynamic, and leave both parties feeling acrimonious toward each other.
How
so?
What
can dominants and subs do about bratty behavior?
First,
each must make a decision whether they actually want the behavior to change.
Some
subs may enter into new relationships having learned bratty behavior in a
previous one, and it worked then, and they assume it will work in the current
one, and unless they are given a good reason for changing their behavior, they
may not want to. do so.
Without
that desire on both sides, any solutions are most likely to result in failure,
and finding and implementing a solution can actually be more challenging for
the dominant than the submissive.
If
asked, many Dominants would quickly respond they want bratty behavior to
change.
Do
they want a bratty sub?
But
to change bratty behavior, in any permanent way, the dynamics of the
relationship must change, as punishment alone will not alter the behavior, and
neither will ignoring it will be effective if this is overused as a tool.
Bratty
dispositions are generally symptomatic of a problem, rather than a problem in
and of itself, and the underlying reasons for bratty behavior need to be dealt
with and addressed.
Few
subs start out as bratty. Bratty is more often a learned behavior, and subs
learn it because it is effective in getting their needs met, and if you are a
dominant who has a bratty submissive try asking yourself these questions:
Was
your submissive bratty when you first started a relationship together?
IF
NOT:
When
did your submissive first start to show signs of bratty behavior?
Did
you find it endearing at the time and subtly encourage it?
Under
what circumstances, does your submissive become bratty, and what tools, if any,
do you use to control the bratty behavior?
Do
these tools actually provide the submissive any kind of reward (attention, pain
play, etc) for bratty behavior?
Have
you ever asked your submissive in a serious manner if they want to be a bratty
sub and listened closely to the answer?
Have
you ever asked your submissive what might help him or her to not be bratty or
why they are being bratty in the first place?
Do
you ensure your subs needs are met to the same level as your own?
Do
you stay aware and conscious of your sub's needs and desires to the same level
that you expect your submissive to stay conscious of your own needs and
desires?
Bratty
behavior is often a sub's way of saying something is wrong in the relationship
dynamic, and few subs want to be bratty.
If
the relationship has been not been equal for a long period of time, sometimes
subs will say they do not care any more, and this is a time for a dominant to
take particular notice that something is seriously wrong here, and if you
really are dedicated to eradicating bratty from your relationship, perhaps it
is time to stop and communicate on a deeper level.
You
need to find out what is triggering the bratty episodes, implement solutions
that work for the submissive as well as the Dominant, and remove the need for
the bratty behavior, initially, and you may be surprised at what a well
behaved, devoted submissive you have in your care, eager to do your bidding.
In
my opening statement, I posed the question:
Is
bratty behavior necessarily a bad thing?
Bratty
behavior can be used as an indicator of the emotional health of a power-exchange
relationship.
Also,
this is a two-way street, as the responsibility for communicating does not rest
solely with dominant, as a submissive has a duty to use his or her voice too.
Inspired by Katrina N. Michaels.
No comments:
Post a Comment